[Précédent (date)] [Suivant (date)] [Précédent (sujet)] [Suivant (sujet)] [Index par date] [Index par sujet]
[Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[email protected]>] Re: Linus: "RH7==broken gcc" -- somebody comment?
- To: Linux Québec (Aide) <>
- Subject: [Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[email protected]>] Re: Linus: "RH7==broken gcc" -- somebody comment?
- From: Dominic Mitchell <>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:30:23 -0500 (EST)
Voici la réplique d'un membre de Redhat au sujet de GCC pour ceux
que cela intéresse ....
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> Now, for the rest, well, use the
> untested, unstable unreleased gcc 2.96 that even the gcc people don't
> want anybody to use because it is broken.
2.96 is neither untested nor unstable nor broken. Unreleased, yes.
Show me any remaining bugs in 2.96-69 (rawhide and soon errata) and I'll
show you 2 bugs in 2.95.2. ;)
Don't you think that compiling our entire distribution, including
Powertools and other add-ons isn't stress-testing a compiler?
2.96 was not some random CVS snapshot; it was a carefully chosen CVS
snapshot with a series of patches to stabilize it.
If you have any actual problems with 2.96-69, go ahead and complain about
them. Don't complain about a compiler just because someone said it was
unstable and untested.
LLaP
bero
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
Dominic Mitchell Email: [email protected]
Department of Economics
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario The XXI century starts on 2001-01-01!
Canada, K7L 3N6 Le XXI siècle débute le 2001-01-01!